太心累了,主要是一开始建堆出现了小问题,导致测试点一直没过。心烦意乱,采用printf调试(bushi),终于找出来了,是因为child的范围没考虑,忘记限制2*i 简单记录下要点,吃饭去了: 哈夫曼编码要点 1. 编码长度之和一定等于哈夫曼编码的长度之和,也就是哈夫曼树各个叶结点的路径之和,所以采用哈夫曼树主要就是为了算出路径长度,图省事,我也没建立树,直接算总和。 2. 要满足前缀码都不相同,cyll在mooc上采用的是构建树的方法去看是否有字符落在不是叶节点上,我偷懒直接采用strcmp暴力遍历 满足这两点就可以算得上是最优编码了。 In 1953, David A. Huffman published his paper "A Method for the Construction of Minimum-Redundancy Codes", and hence printed his name in the history of computer science. As a professor who gives the final exam problem on Huffman codes, I am encountering a big problem: the Huffman codes are NOT unique. For example, given a string "aaaxuaxz", we can observe that the frequencies of the characters 'a', 'x', 'u' and 'z' are 4, 2, 1 and 1, respectively. We may either encode the symbols as {'a'=0, 'x'=10, 'u'=110, 'z'=111}, or in another way as {'a'=1, 'x'=01, 'u'=001, 'z'=000}, both compress the string into 14 bits. Another set of code can be given as {'a'=0, 'x'=11, 'u'=100, 'z'=101}, but {'a'=0, 'x'=01, 'u'=011, 'z'=001} is NOT correct since "aaaxuaxz" and "aazuaxax" can both be decoded from the code 00001011001001. The students are submitting all kinds of codes, and I need a computer program to help me determine which ones are correct and which ones are not. Each input file contains one test case. For each case, the first line gives an integer N (2≤N≤63), then followed by a line that contains all the N distinct characters and their frequencies in the following format: where c[i] is a character chosen from {'0' - '9', 'a' - 'z', 'A' - 'Z', '_'}, and f[i] is the frequency of c[i] and is an integer no more than 1000. The next line gives a positive integer M (≤1000), then followed by M student submissions. Each student submission consists of N lines, each in the format: where c[i] is the i-th character and code[i] is an non-empty string of no more than 63 '0's and '1's. For each test case, print in each line either "Yes" if the student's submission is correct, or "No" if not. Note: The optimal solution is not necessarily generated by Huffman algorithm. Any prefix code with code length being optimal is considered correct. 结尾无空行 结尾无空行 比较混乱,有闲情逸致再来修改总结。挥挥~ Input Specification:
c[1] f[1] c[2] f[2] ... c[N] f[N]
c[i] code[i]
Output Specification:
Sample Input:
7
A 1 B 1 C 1 D 3 E 3 F 6 G 6
4
A 00000
B 00001
C 0001
D 001
E 01
F 10
G 11
A 01010
B 01011
C 0100
D 011
E 10
F 11
G 00
A 000
B 001
C 010
D 011
E 100
F 101
G 110
A 00000
B 00001
C 0001
D 001
E 00
F 10
G 11
Sample Output:
Yes
Yes
No
No
#include



