我进行了一些模拟测试,以记录Save()和Persist()之间的区别。
听起来这两种方法在处理瞬态实体时行为相同,而在处理分离实体时则不同。
对于下面的示例,将EmployeeVehicle作为一个实体,其中PK作为生成的值和vehicleName作为其属性之一,是vehicleId。
示例1:处理瞬态对象
Session session = factory.openSession(); session.beginTransaction(); EmployeeVehicle entity = new EmployeeVehicle(); entity.setVehicleName("Honda"); session.save(entity); // session.persist(entity); session.getTransaction().commit(); session.close();结果:
select nextval ('hibernate_sequence')//这是针对生成的车辆ID:36insert into Employee_Vehicle ( Vehicle_Name, Vehicle_Id) values ( Honda, 36)Repeat the same with using persist(entity) and will result the same with new Id ( say 37 , honda ) ;
示例2:处理分离的对象
// Session 1 // Get the previously saved Vehicle Entity Session session = factory.openSession(); session.beginTransaction(); EmployeeVehicle entity = (EmployeeVehicle)session.get(EmployeeVehicle.class, 36);session.close();// Session 2// Here in Session 2 , vehicle entity obtained in previous session is a detached object and now we will try to save / persist it (i) Using Save() to persist a detached object Session session2 = factory.openSession(); session2.beginTransaction(); entity.setVehicleName("Toyota"); session2.save(entity); session2.getTransaction().commit(); session2.close();结果:您可能希望在上次会话中获得的ID为36的车辆被更新为名称“ Toyota”。但是发生的是,一个新实体保存在数据库中,并为其生成了新ID,名称为“
Toyota”。
select nextval ('hibernate_sequence') insert into Employee_Vehicle ( Vehicle_Name, Vehicle_Id) values ( Toyota, 39) (ii) Using Persist() to persist a detached object // Session 1 Session session = factory.openSession(); session.beginTransaction(); EmployeeVehicle entity = EmployeeVehicle)session.get(EmployeeVehicle.class, 36); session.close();//会话2 //在会话2中,在前一会话中获得的车辆实体是一个分离的对象,现在我们将尝试保存/持久化它(i)使用persist()来持久化一个分离的对象
Session session2 = factory.openSession(); session2.beginTransaction(); entity.setVehicleName("Toyota"); session2.persist(entity); session2.getTransaction().commit(); session2.close();结果:抛出异常:传递给持久对象的分离实体
因此,始终最好使用Persist()而不是Save(),因为在处理会话和事务时必须谨慎使用save。



