这是Python 3的COPY FROM的二进制等效文件:
from io import BytesIOfrom struct import packimport psycopg2# Two rows of data; "id" is not in the upstream data source# Columns: node, ts, val1, val2data = [(23253, 342, -15.336734, 2494627.949375), (23256, 348, 43.23524, 2494827.949375)]conn = psycopg2.connect("dbname=mydb user=postgres")curs = conn.cursor()# Determine starting value for sequencecurs.execute("SELECt nextval('num_data_id_seq')")id_seq = curs.fetchone()[0]# Make a binary file object for COPY FROMcpy = BytesIO()# 11-byte signature, no flags, no header extensioncpy.write(pack('!11sii', b'PGCOPYn377rn ', 0, 0))# Columns: id, node, ts, val1, val2# Zip: (column position, format, size)row_format = list(zip(range(-1, 4),('i', 'i', 'h', 'f', 'd'),( 4, 4, 2, 4, 8 )))for row in data: # Number of columns/fields (always 5) cpy.write(pack('!h', 5)) for col, fmt, size in row_format: value = (id_seq if col == -1 else row[col]) cpy.write(pack('!i' + fmt, size, value)) id_seq += 1 # manually increment sequence outside of database# File trailercpy.write(pack('!h', -1))# Copy data to databasecpy.seek(0)curs.copy_expert("COPY num_data FROM STDIN WITH BINARY", cpy)# Update sequence on databasecurs.execute("SELECT setval('num_data_id_seq', %s, false)", (id_seq,))conn.commit()更新资料
我改写了上面的方法来为COPY编写文件。我在Python中的数据位于NumPy数组中,因此使用它们很有意义。这是一个
data具有1M行,7列的示例:
import psycopg2import numpy as npfrom struct import packfrom io import BytesIOfrom datetime import datetimeconn = psycopg2.connect("dbname=mydb user=postgres")curs = conn.cursor()# NumPy record arrayshape = (7, 2000, 500)print('Generating data with %i rows, %i columns' % (shape[1]*shape[2], shape[0]))dtype = ([('id', 'i4'), ('node', 'i4'), ('ts', 'i2')] + [('s' + str(x), 'f4') for x in range(shape[0])])data = np.empty(shape[1]*shape[2], dtype)data['id'] = np.arange(shape[1]*shape[2]) + 1data['node'] = np.tile(np.arange(shape[1]) + 1, shape[2])data['ts'] = np.repeat(np.arange(shape[2]) + 1, shape[1])data['s0'] = np.random.rand(shape[1]*shape[2]) * 100prv = 's0'for nxt in data.dtype.names[4:]: data[nxt] = data[prv] + np.random.rand(shape[1]*shape[2]) * 10 prv = nxt在我的数据库中,我有两个看起来像的表:
CREATE TABLE num_data_binary( id integer PRIMARY KEY, node integer NOT NULL, ts smallint NOT NULL, s0 real, s1 real, s2 real, s3 real, s4 real, s5 real, s6 real) WITH (OIDS=FALSE);
另一个类似的表名为
num_data_text。
以下是一些简单的辅助函数,它们通过使用NumPy记录数组中的信息为COPY(文本和二进制格式)准备数据:
def prepare_text(dat): cpy = BytesIO() for row in dat: cpy.write('t'.join([repr(x) for x in row]) + 'n') return(cpy)def prepare_binary(dat): pgcopy_dtype = [('num_fields','>i2')] for field, dtype in dat.dtype.descr: pgcopy_dtype += [(field + '_length', '>i4'), (field, dtype.replace('<', '>'))] pgcopy = np.empty(dat.shape, pgcopy_dtype) pgcopy['num_fields'] = len(dat.dtype) for i in range(len(dat.dtype)): field = dat.dtype.names[i] pgcopy[field + '_length'] = dat.dtype[i].alignment pgcopy[field] = dat[field] cpy = BytesIO() cpy.write(pack('!11sii', b'PGCOPYn377rn ', 0, 0)) cpy.write(pgcopy.tostring()) # all rows cpy.write(pack('!h', -1)) # file trailer return(cpy)这就是我使用帮助程序函数对两种COPY格式方法进行基准测试的方式:
def time_pgcopy(dat, table, binary): print('Processing copy object for ' + table) tstart = datetime.now() if binary: cpy = prepare_binary(dat) else: # text cpy = prepare_text(dat) tendw = datetime.now() print('Copy object prepared in ' + str(tendw - tstart) + '; ' + str(cpy.tell()) + ' bytes; transfering to database') cpy.seek(0) if binary: curs.copy_expert('COPY ' + table + ' FROM STDIN WITH BINARY', cpy) else: # text curs.copy_from(cpy, table) conn.commit() tend = datetime.now() print('Database copy time: ' + str(tend - tendw)) print(' Total time: ' + str(tend - tstart)) returntime_pgcopy(data, 'num_data_text', binary=False)time_pgcopy(data, 'num_data_binary', binary=True)这是最后两个
time_pgcopy命令的输出:
Processing copy object for num_data_textCopy object prepared in 0:01:15.288695; 84355016 bytes; transfering to databaseDatabase copy time: 0:00:37.929166 Total time: 0:01:53.217861Processing copy object for num_data_binaryCopy object prepared in 0:00:01.296143; 80000021 bytes; transfering to databaseDatabase copy time: 0:00:23.325952 Total time: 0:00:24.622095
因此,使用二进制方法,NumPy→文件和File→数据库步骤都更快。明显的区别是Python如何准备COPY文件,这对于文本来说确实很慢。通常,二进制格式会以这种格式的文本格式在2/3的时间内将其加载到数据库中。
最后,我比较了数据库中两个表中的值,以查看数字是否不同。大约1.46%的行的column值不同
s0,并且该比例的值增加到6.17%
s6(可能与我使用的随机方法有关)。所有70M
32位浮点值之间的非零绝对差值介于9.3132257e-010和7.6293945e-006之间。文本和二进制加载方法之间的这些细微差别是由于文本格式方法所需的float→text→float转换而导致精度损失。



