是的，似乎
np.clip慢
pandas.Series于
numpy.ndarrays。没错，但实际上（至少在无症状的情况下）还不错。8000个元素仍然处于运行状态，其中恒定因素是运行时的主要贡献者。我认为这是问题的一个非常重要的方面，因此我正在形象地看待（从另一个答案中借用）：
# Setupimport pandas as pdimport numpy as npdef on_series(s): return np.clip(s, a_min=None, a_max=1)def on_values_of_series(s): return np.clip(s.values, a_min=None, a_max=1)# Timing setuptimings = {on_series: [], on_values_of_series: []}sizes = [2**i for i in range(1, 26, 2)]# Timingfor size in sizes: func_input = pd.Series(np.random.randint(0, 30, size=size)) for func in timings: res = %timeit -o func(func_input) timings[func].append(res)%matplotlib notebookimport matplotlib.pyplot as pltimport numpy as npfig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(1, 2)for func in timings: ax1.plot(sizes, [time.best for time in timings[func]], label=str(func.__name__))ax1.set_xscale('log')ax1.set_yscale('log')ax1.set_xlabel('size')ax1.set_ylabel('time [seconds]')ax1.grid(which='both')ax1.legend()baseline = on_values_of_series # choose one function as baselinefor func in timings: ax2.plot(sizes, [time.best / ref.best for time, ref in zip(timings[func], timings[baseline])], label=str(func.__name__))ax2.set_yscale('log')ax2.set_xscale('log')ax2.set_xlabel('size')ax2.set_ylabel('time relative to {}'.format(baseline.__name__))ax2.grid(which='both')ax2.legend()plt.tight_layout()这是一个对数-
对数图，因为我认为这更清楚地显示了重要功能。例如，它表明
np.clipa
numpy.ndarray上的速度更快，但在那种情况下它的常数因子也小得多。大型阵列的差异仅为〜3！这仍然是一个很大的差异，但是比小型阵列的差异要小。
但是，这仍然不能解决时差来自何处的问题。
解决方案实际上非常简单：
np.clip将第一个参数的
clip方法 委托给：
>>> np.clip??Source: def clip(a, a_min, a_max, out=None): """ ... """ return _wrapfunc(a, 'clip', a_min, a_max, out=out)>>> np.core.fromnumeric._wrapfunc??Source: def _wrapfunc(obj, method, *args, **kwds): try: return getattr(obj, method)(*args, **kwds) # ... except (AttributeError, TypeError): return _wrapit(obj, method, *args, **kwds)
在
getattr该行
_wrapfunc的功能是重要的线在这里，因为
np.ndarray.clip和
pd.Series.clip不同的方法，是的，
完全不同的方法 ：
>>> np.ndarray.clip<method 'clip' of 'numpy.ndarray' objects>>>> pd.Series.clip<function pandas.core.generic.NDframe.clip>
不幸的是
np.ndarray.clip，它是一个C函数，因此很难对其进行分析，但是它
pd.Series.clip是常规的Python函数，因此它易于分析。让我们在这里使用一系列5000个整数：
s = pd.Series(np.random.randint(0, 100, 5000))
对于
np.clip在
values我得到以下行剖析：
%load_ext line_profiler%lprun -f np.clip -f np.core.fromnumeric._wrapfunc np.clip(s.values, a_min=None, a_max=1)Timer unit: 4.10256e-07 sTotal time: 2.25641e-05 sFile: numpycorefromnumeric.pyFunction: clip at line 1673Line # Hits Time Per Hit % Time Line Contents============================================================== 1673 def clip(a, a_min, a_max, out=None): 1674 """ ... 1726 """ 1727 155 55.0 100.0 return _wrapfunc(a, 'clip', a_min, a_max, out=out)Total time: 1.51795e-05 sFile: numpycorefromnumeric.pyFunction: _wrapfunc at line 55Line # Hits Time Per Hit % Time Line Contents============================================================== 55 def _wrapfunc(obj, method, *args, **kwds): 56 1 2 2.0 5.4 try: 57 135 35.0 94.6 return getattr(obj, method)(*args, **kwds) 58 59 # An AttributeError occurs if the object does not have 60 # such a method in its class. 61 62 # A TypeError occurs if the object does have such a method 63 # in its class, but its signature is not identical to that 64 # of NumPy's. This situation has occurred in the case of 65 # a downstream library like 'pandas'. 66 except (AttributeError, TypeError): 67 return _wrapit(obj, method, *args, **kwds)
但是对于
np.clip，
Series我得到了完全不同的分析结果：
%lprun -f np.clip -f np.core.fromnumeric._wrapfunc -f pd.Series.clip -f pd.Series._clip_with_scalar np.clip(s, a_min=None, a_max=1)Timer unit: 4.10256e-07 sTotal time: 0.000823794 sFile: numpycorefromnumeric.pyFunction: clip at line 1673Line # Hits Time Per Hit % Time Line Contents============================================================== 1673 def clip(a, a_min, a_max, out=None): 1674 """ ... 1726 """ 1727 1 2008 2008.0 100.0 return _wrapfunc(a, 'clip', a_min, a_max, out=out)Total time: 0.00081846 sFile: numpycorefromnumeric.pyFunction: _wrapfunc at line 55Line # Hits Time Per Hit % Time Line Contents============================================================== 55 def _wrapfunc(obj, method, *args, **kwds): 56 1 2 2.0 0.1 try: 57 1 1993 1993.0 99.9 return getattr(obj, method)(*args, **kwds) 58 59 # An AttributeError occurs if the object does not have 60 # such a method in its class. 61 62 # A TypeError occurs if the object does have such a method 63 # in its class, but its signature is not identical to that 64 # of NumPy's. This situation has occurred in the case of 65 # a downstream library like 'pandas'. 66 except (AttributeError, TypeError): 67 return _wrapit(obj, method, *args, **kwds)Total time: 0.000804922 sFile: pandascoregeneric.pyFunction: clip at line 4969Line # Hits Time Per Hit % Time Line Contents============================================================== 4969 def clip(self, lower=None, upper=None, axis=None, inplace=False, 4970 *args, **kwargs): 4971 """ ... 5021 """ 5022 112 12.0 0.6 if isinstance(self, ABCPanel): 5023raise NotImplementedError("clip is not supported yet for panels") 5024 5025 110 10.0 0.5 inplace = validate_bool_kwarg(inplace, 'inplace') 5026 5027 169 69.0 3.5 axis = nv.validate_clip_with_axis(axis, args, kwargs) 5028 5029 # GH 17276 5030 # numpy doesn't like NaN as a clip value 5031 # so ignore 5032 1 158 158.0 8.1 if np.any(pd.isnull(lower)): 5033 1 3 3.0 0.2 lower = None 5034 126 26.0 1.3 if np.any(pd.isnull(upper)): 5035upper = None 5036 5037 # GH 2747 (arguments were reversed) 5038 1 1 1.0 0.1 if lower is not None and upper is not None: 5039if is_scalar(lower) and is_scalar(upper): 5040 lower, upper = min(lower, upper), max(lower, upper) 5041 5042 # fast-path for scalars 5043 1 1 1.0 0.1 if ((lower is None or (is_scalar(lower) and is_number(lower))) and 5044 128 28.0 1.4 (upper is None or (is_scalar(upper) and is_number(upper)))): 5045 1 1654 1654.0 84.3 return self._clip_with_scalar(lower, upper, inplace=inplace) 5046 5047 result = self 5048 if lower is not None: 5049result = result.clip_lower(lower, axis, inplace=inplace) 5050 if upper is not None: 5051if inplace: 5052 result = self 5053result = result.clip_upper(upper, axis, inplace=inplace) 5054 5055 return resultTotal time: 0.000662153 sFile: pandascoregeneric.pyFunction: _clip_with_scalar at line 4920Line # Hits Time Per Hit % Time Line Contents============================================================== 4920 def _clip_with_scalar(self, lower, upper, inplace=False): 4921 1 2 2.0 0.1 if ((lower is not None and np.any(isna(lower))) or 4922 125 25.0 1.5 (upper is not None and np.any(isna(upper)))): 4923raise ValueError("Cannot use an NA value as a clip threshold") 4924 4925 122 22.0 1.4 result = self.values 4926 1 571 571.0 35.4 mask = isna(result) 4927 4928 195 95.0 5.9 with np.errstate(all='ignore'): 4929 1 1 1.0 0.1 if upper is not None: 4930 1 141 141.0 8.7 result = np.where(result >= upper, upper, result) 4931 133 33.0 2.0 if lower is not None: 4932 result = np.where(result <= lower, lower, result) 4933 173 73.0 4.5 if np.any(mask): 4934result[mask] = np.nan 4935 4936 190 90.0 5.6 axes_dict = self._construct_axes_dict() 4937 1 558 558.0 34.6 result = self._constructor(result, **axes_dict).__finalize__(self) 4938 4939 1 2 2.0 0.1 if inplace: 4940self._update_inplace(result) 4941 else: 4942 1 1 1.0 0.1 return result那时我不再进入子例程，因为它已经突出显示了在哪里
pd.Series.clip执行的工作比在处更多
np.ndarray.clip。只需将（55个计时器单位）
np.clip上的调用总时间与该方法
values中的第一个检查（158个计时器单位）进行比较即可。那时，pandas方法甚至没有从裁剪开始，它已经花费了3倍的时间。
pandas.Series.clip``ifnp.any(pd.isnull(lower))
但是，当数组很大时，这些“开销”中的几个就变得微不足道了：
s = pd.Series(np.random.randint(0, 100, 1000000))%lprun -f np.clip -f np.core.fromnumeric._wrapfunc -f pd.Series.clip -f pd.Series._clip_with_scalar np.clip(s, a_min=None, a_max=1)Timer unit: 4.10256e-07 sTotal time: 0.00593476 sFile: numpycorefromnumeric.pyFunction: clip at line 1673Line # Hits Time Per Hit % Time Line Contents============================================================== 1673 def clip(a, a_min, a_max, out=None): 1674 """ ... 1726 """ 1727 1 14466 14466.0 100.0 return _wrapfunc(a, 'clip', a_min, a_max, out=out)Total time: 0.00592779 sFile: numpycorefromnumeric.pyFunction: _wrapfunc at line 55Line # Hits Time Per Hit % Time Line Contents============================================================== 55 def _wrapfunc(obj, method, *args, **kwds): 56 1 1 1.0 0.0 try: 57 1 14448 14448.0 100.0 return getattr(obj, method)(*args, **kwds) 58 59 # An AttributeError occurs if the object does not have 60 # such a method in its class. 61 62 # A TypeError occurs if the object does have such a method 63 # in its class, but its signature is not identical to that 64 # of NumPy's. This situation has occurred in the case of 65 # a downstream library like 'pandas'. 66 except (AttributeError, TypeError): 67 return _wrapit(obj, method, *args, **kwds)Total time: 0.00591302 sFile: pandascoregeneric.pyFunction: clip at line 4969Line # Hits Time Per Hit % Time Line Contents============================================================== 4969 def clip(self, lower=None, upper=None, axis=None, inplace=False, 4970 *args, **kwargs): 4971 """ ... 5021 """ 5022 117 17.0 0.1 if isinstance(self, ABCPanel): 5023raise NotImplementedError("clip is not supported yet for panels") 5024 5025 114 14.0 0.1 inplace = validate_bool_kwarg(inplace, 'inplace') 5026 5027 197 97.0 0.7 axis = nv.validate_clip_with_axis(axis, args, kwargs) 5028 5029 # GH 17276 5030 # numpy doesn't like NaN as a clip value 5031 # so ignore 5032 1 125 125.0 0.9 if np.any(pd.isnull(lower)): 5033 1 2 2.0 0.0 lower = None 5034 130 30.0 0.2 if np.any(pd.isnull(upper)): 5035upper = None 5036 5037 # GH 2747 (arguments were reversed) 5038 1 2 2.0 0.0 if lower is not None and upper is not None: 5039if is_scalar(lower) and is_scalar(upper): 5040 lower, upper = min(lower, upper), max(lower, upper) 5041 5042 # fast-path for scalars 5043 1 2 2.0 0.0 if ((lower is None or (is_scalar(lower) and is_number(lower))) and 5044 132 32.0 0.2 (upper is None or (is_scalar(upper) and is_number(upper)))): 5045 1 14092 14092.0 97.8 return self._clip_with_scalar(lower, upper, inplace=inplace) 5046 5047 result = self 5048 if lower is not None: 5049result = result.clip_lower(lower, axis, inplace=inplace) 5050 if upper is not None: 5051if inplace: 5052 result = self 5053result = result.clip_upper(upper, axis, inplace=inplace) 5054 5055 return resultTotal time: 0.00575753 sFile: pandascoregeneric.pyFunction: _clip_with_scalar at line 4920Line # Hits Time Per Hit % Time Line Contents============================================================== 4920 def _clip_with_scalar(self, lower, upper, inplace=False): 4921 1 2 2.0 0.0 if ((lower is not None and np.any(isna(lower))) or 4922 128 28.0 0.2 (upper is not None and np.any(isna(upper)))): 4923raise ValueError("Cannot use an NA value as a clip threshold") 4924 4925 1 120 120.0 0.9 result = self.values 4926 1 3525 3525.0 25.1 mask = isna(result) 4927 4928 186 86.0 0.6 with np.errstate(all='ignore'): 4929 1 2 2.0 0.0 if upper is not None: 4930 1 9314 9314.0 66.4 result = np.where(result >= upper, upper, result) 4931 161 61.0 0.4 if lower is not None: 4932 result = np.where(result <= lower, lower, result) 4933 1 283 283.0 2.0 if np.any(mask): 4934result[mask] = np.nan 4935 4936 178 78.0 0.6 axes_dict = self._construct_axes_dict() 4937 1 532 532.0 3.8 result = self._constructor(result, **axes_dict).__finalize__(self) 4938 4939 1 2 2.0 0.0 if inplace: 4940self._update_inplace(result) 4941 else: 4942 1 1 1.0 0.0 return result仍然存在多个函数调用，例如
isna和
np.where，这需要花费大量时间，但是总的来说，这至少与该
np.ndarray.clip时间相当（这是在我的计算机上，时间差约为3的状态）。
外卖可能应该是：
- 许多NumPy函数只是委托给传入对象的方法，因此当您传入不同对象时，可能会有巨大差异。
- 剖析，尤其是行剖析，可以成为查找性能差异来源的好工具。
- 在这种情况下，请务必确保测试大小不同的对象。您可能正在比较可能无关紧要的常数因子，除非您处理许多小数组。
使用的版本：
Python 3.6.3 64-bit on Windows 10Numpy 1.13.3Pandas 0.21.1
