gmat The price the goA recent study has provided clues to pr
gmat The price the goA recent study has provided clues to predator-prey dynamics in the late Pleistocene era.Researchers compared the number of tooth fractures in present-day carnivores with tooth fractures in carnivores that lived 36,000 to 10,000 years ago and that were preserved in the Rancho La Brea tar pits in Los Angeles.The breakage frequencies in the extinct species were strikingly higher than those in the present-day species.In considering possible explanations for this finding,the researchers dismissed demographic bias because older individuals were not overrepresented in the fossil samples.They rejected preservational bias because a total absence of breakage in two extinct species demonstrated that the fractures were not the result of abrasion within the pits.They ruled out local bias because breakage data obtained from other Pleistocene sites were similar to the La Brea data.The explanation they consider most plausible is behavioral differences between extinct and present-day carnivores-in particular,more contact between the teeth of predators and the bones of prey due to more thorough consumption of carcasses by the extinct species.Such thorough carcass consumption implies to the researchers either that prey availability was low,at least seasonally,or that there was intense competition over kills and a high rate of carcass theft due to relatively high predator densities.The passage suggests that tooth fractures in Pleistocene carnivores probably tended to occur less frequentlyA during periods in which more prey were availableB at sites distant from the La Brea areaC in older individual carnivoresD in species that were not preserved as fossilsE in species that regularly stole carcasses from other species定位在最后一句,不懂为什么定位在最后一句,tooth fractures么?最后一句不是没有提 tooth fractures么?
最佳回答
由于这两段话就是围绕tooth fracture 展开的,你在读题目定位的时候就不能用tooth fracture定位,题目当中的occur less frequently 才是解题关键第一段交代背景:n年前灭绝的肉食动物牙齿磨损率 要 比现在的肉食动物的牙齿磨损率 要高得多第二段快速浏览发现:研究者为了找到正确答案排除了三种偏见。注意三个动词dismiss,reject,rule out,和题目所问没关系,迅速跳过。直到most plausible 这里后面才要关注。原来是behaviorial difference造成的:因为远古动物啃尸体啃得更烂~(比较重口,大意如此)为啥啃得烂呢,注意这里Such thorough carcass consumption implies to the researchers either。。。or。。。either or提示你两个解释:要么没啥东西吃,要么捕食者太多,竞争激烈题目当中的陷阱在于:假设远古时代捕食者牙齿磨损率没有那么高(less frequently),会因为什么呢?自然就和文章最后结论相反咯--》吃的东西多了呗 (就不用那么苦逼的去嚼啊嚼,吃了上顿没下顿)所以这个题目比较狡猾。读题目的时候就要小心less frequently 和第一段的结论strikingly higher相反,那就要赶紧找到造成strikingly higher的结论(由文中implies 引导)的第一点:availability was lows,答案和这句话相对应(more available),只不过取了反义词而已简单来说就是:牙齿磨损高
最新回答共有2条回答
-
2026-04-06 18:33:37傲娇的画笔
回复由于这两段话就是围绕tooth fracture 展开的,你在读题目定位的时候就不能用tooth fracture定位,题目当中的occur less frequently 才是解题关键第一段交代背景:n年前灭绝的肉食动物牙齿磨损率 要 比现在的肉食动物的牙齿磨损率 要高得多第二段快速浏览发现:研究者为了找到正确答案排除了三种偏见。注意三个动词dismiss,reject,rule out,和题目所问没关系,迅速跳过。直到most plausible 这里后面才要关注。原来是behaviorial difference造成的:因为远古动物啃尸体啃得更烂~(比较重口,大意如此)为啥啃得烂呢,注意这里Such thorough carcass consumption implies to the researchers either。。。or。。。either or提示你两个解释:要么没啥东西吃,要么捕食者太多,竞争激烈题目当中的陷阱在于:假设远古时代捕食者牙齿磨损率没有那么高(less frequently),会因为什么呢?自然就和文章最后结论相反咯--》吃的东西多了呗 (就不用那么苦逼的去嚼啊嚼,吃了上顿没下顿)所以这个题目比较狡猾。读题目的时候就要小心less frequently 和第一段的结论strikingly higher相反,那就要赶紧找到造成strikingly higher的结论(由文中implies 引导)的第一点:availability was lows,答案和这句话相对应(more available),只不过取了反义词而已简单来说就是:牙齿磨损高
热门文章
- 康达学院专转本五年制
- 高考一个考场分ab卷吗
- not only but also用法
- 某物体做自由落体运动,从释放开始计时,则物体在前2s内的平均速度为______m/s,物体下落2m时的速度大小为______m/s.
- 三角函数公式大全表格
- 地理中考必背知识点2022
- 2013-2014学年小学六年级科学上学期期末考试试卷及答案
- 人教版2014-2015学年小学五年级英语第二学期期中教学质量检测试卷及答案
- 【Linux驱动开发】设备树详解(二)设备树语法详解
- 别跟客户扯细节
- 在别的城市买房子能落户吗
- 卖房前要把装修贷还完吗
- 高中政治教学提高教学效果的方法探究
- “互联网+”背景下的初中英语课堂教学改革与创新策略研究
- 2022年终止合同范本
- 租房合同范本范文
- 如何挑选土豆
- 如何挑选土鸡
