题文
“Now I just don’t believe that.” Surely all of us, at some point, have watched a movie and thought: It’s simply badly researched, or, the makers must think we’re fools.If movies were completely scientifically accurate, they’d probably be as interesting as a Physics 101 lecture. In real life, there are no explosions in space, gas usually doesn’t explode from a lit cigarette, and Bruce Willis / Jackie Chan / Will Smith would most likely be in a coma(昏迷) after getting kicked in the head.
Recently, the British newspaper The Daily Telegraph ran a humorous piece on unconvincing tech moments from some top movies. Let’s see what they are all about.
Telegraph writer Tom Chivers’ first example is from the end-of-the-world movie Independence Day, in which a character comes up with a virus capable of destroying Windows, the computer system the alien(外星人的) spacecraft uses. “It’s a good thing they didn’t have Norton antivirus,” jokes Chivers.
It’s just one case of a movie that takes a lot of license with its science. Another one Chivers mentions is from Star Wars, where glowing beams of light traveling through space look very impressive. The problem is that in space there are no air particles(颗粒) for the light to reflect off. In reality, they’d not be seen, which wouldn’t look so cool on the big screen.
Chivers’ second piece of Star Wars nonsense is the sound the fighters make in the movies: “ the bellow(咆哮) of an elephant mixed with a car driving on a wet road”. But sound needs a medium to travel through, like air. In space, there wouldn’t actually be any sound at all.
Few people would deny that the mind-bending Matrix films make for great viewing, but for Chivers, the science in the movies is a little silly.
And finally: as Chivers points out, DAN is not replaceable. But this bit of elementary genetics passed the makers of the 2002 Bond film Die another Day by. In the film the villain(坏人) has “gene therapy” to change his appearance and his DNA, which is completely impossible.
小题1:What does the text mainly deal with?A．Plots of some famous movies.B．Characters in space movies.C．Popularity of space movies.D．Mistakes made in some movies.小题2:From the first two paragraphs we can know that some movie makers ____.A．went against general knowledge of scienceB．didn’t pay attention to the viewers’ real demandC．overestimated viewers’ appreciation of movies.D．didn’t try their best to improve the quality of the movies.小题3:What does the underlined word “they” in Paragraph 3 refer to?A．The newspapers. B．Unconvincing tech momentsC．Some top movies.D．Heroes in the movies.小题4:We can learn from Paragraph 7 that ____.A．most people like Matrix filmsB．the truth of Matrix films remains in doubtC．few people think Matrix films sillyD．Chivers thinks science is unacceptable 题型：未知 难度：其他题型
答案
小题1:D
小题2:A
小题3:B
小题4:A
解析
文章讲述了在电影中使用了很多科幻的东西，便影片看起了非常刺激，电影不可非常的遵循科学，如果那样的话，他就成了物理的讲座。但是在电影中所采用的很多手段，其实在现实生活中是不存在的，文章举了几个电影作业例子。
小题1:D综合理解题。本文前两自然段介绍了本文的主要内容，即电影中很多的场面都是不能令我们信服的，电影的制作人认为我们是傻子，在实际生活中，太空是不会有爆炸的，汽油也不会因为一根香烟而爆炸。所以答案D是正确的，意为：在电影中犯的一些错误。A为一些著名电影的小伎俩；B为太空电影中的人物角色; C为太空电影的流行。均不符合文章的意思。
小题2:A细节理解题。从电影的制作者认为我们是傻子以及电影中的很多场面在现实中不会存在，例如太空的爆炸等可知电影的制作者违背了科学的常识，故答案A是正确的。
小题3:B词义理解题。第三自然段的意思是：最尽，英国的太晤士报发布了一些顶尖电影中的不令人信服的科学元素，让我们看看他们是什么吧。由此可知They是指不能令人信服的科学元素。
小题4:A段落理解题。第七自然段的意思是没有人否认这些怪怪的电影取得了好的观看效果，但是对Chivers来说，电影中的科学有点愚蠢。
考点:社会现象类文章的阅读理解。
考点
据考高分专家说，试题““Now I just don’t be.....”主要考查你对 [社会现象类阅读 ]考点的理解。社会现象类阅读
社会现象类阅读概念：
这类文章通过写人记事来揭示文章的主题，显示其社会意义，一般采用顺序或倒叙来叙述。题目经常是一些细节问题。考查的方面可以是原因和其中引发的思考。
社会现象类阅读解题技巧：
这类文章通过写人记事来揭示文章的主题，显示其社会意义，一般采用顺序或倒叙来叙述。题目经常是一些细节问题。考查的方面可以是原因和其中引发的思考。阅读这类文章要理清思路。
1、浏览试题，明确要求。
在阅读文章前，最好先浏览一下文章后面的题干和选项。知道了问题后再去看文章，可使思路更敏捷，而且也便于阅读时留意文中出现的与选项有关的信息。
2、通读全文，抓住主要内容。
在不影响理解的前提下，尽可能地阅读以便在尽可能短的时间内理解文章或段落的内容。阅读时，如遇到不熟悉的单词、词组或一时看不懂的句子，不要停下来苦思冥想，继续读下去，通过上下文的词语和句子可能就理解了。
3、抓住中心思想和段落大意。
通读全文时，要特别注意主题句。每篇文章或每个段落都有与文章有关的句子，尤其是科技、政论性文章的主题句一般都在文章的开头或结尾，插在中间的很少。所以，文章的第一段或开头的第一、二个句子往往包含着文章的中心思想、作者的意图或全文的概述，因此要特别注意，彻底理解。
4、有针对性地仔细阅读，找寻所需信息。
在前面的基础上，可进行有针对性地阅读了。把与问题无关的内容一扫而过，而对于和问题有关的内容认真阅读，还可以用笔在下面做出记号。再把这些信息与问题的要求结合起来，逐条分析，综合判断，找出正确答案。
5、进行合理的推理判断。
对文章有了全面的了解之后，可以按照文章要求以及上下文之间的关系，做出推理判断。在进行推理判断的时候，需要综合考虑句型、语法、句子之间的逻辑关系、文化背景等方面的因素。
6、认真复读，验证答案。
要用全文的中心思想统帅各个题目，研究其内在联系和逻辑关系，并依次审核那些还未打上的题目，确保理解无误。
